About Us | Contact Us
View Cart

New Metrics for a New Round of SOC Reviews

By Matt Jolley | Monday, October 1, 2018 - Leave a Comment

Just in time for the next round of SOC reviews, we’ve reviewed and updated our metrics…


Well it’s that time of year again: the days are growing shorter, the leaves are changing color and your compliance officer is gathering up SOC reports for this year’s round of reviews!

Here at infotex we’ve long maintained a spreadsheet containing the key information from SOC reviews–number of expected controls, missing controls, number of exceptions and so on–but as the years have gone by our review process has been refined and we discovered that our most recent scores were diverging slightly from reports completed many years ago.

As the resident “SOC Guru,” the task of creating a new table of metrics fell upon me, and after several hours of collecting and sorting the data from the last three rounds of reviews I’m proud to offer a look at the metrics we’ll be using when comparing reviews starting this year.

On average, our “Overall Risk” metric (a combination of the risk level we’ve assigned to missing controls and noted exceptions) for reviews conducted since 2016 is 131.90. That number doesn’t mean much by itself, but in the context of the report we prepare for clients the overall risk metric allows you to compare your vendors with others we have reviewed recently. How does your core processor’s risk compare to other such vendors we’ve reviewed? The overall risk score will give you a general idea.

To see what we mean, we’ve made available a version of our metrics spreadsheet (with vendor names replaced with a generic description) available for free, and it is located here.

For those who don’t feel like browsing through a spreadsheet at the moment, here’s a few takeaways from our latest metrics review: the three organizations with the lowest risk were a datacenter for cloud computing and two other datacenters, coming in with overall risk metric numbers around 80. On the other end of the spectrum, our highest overall risk was found in a datacenter, a credit/debit card processor and a mortgage processor–their overall risk was around 180.

We think the data shows that the type of vendor has little to do with the overall risk: there isn’t one type of organization you can assume to be “safe” or “unsafe.” We can also say that there also isn’t a clear correlation between the size and clout an organization may have and the risk they may present to your company–some big names in the industry posted great scores, and others were considerably worse. You can use our metrics to compare your relative risk once you receive a score, but you can’t use them as a guide for a vendor that has yet to be reviewed.


Article by Matt Jolley, Staff Auditor at infotex.


same_strip_012513


 

Latest News
    The Four Basic Truths of System Security Webinar-Video The last thirty years have seen an evolution of frameworks, laws, and assessment approaches to information security which can intimidate the management team with their complexity. This webinar will discuss the four basic truths of system security regardless of frameworks or approach, and eight control systems to […]
    Community Banking and their layers of security. . . Michael Hartke’s first post as Executive Vice President! Thinking back to my first talk to security professionals in community banking almost 10 years ago, the question continues to this day. First some background… infotex was moderating the Indiana Bankers Association Security Conference when one of the […]
    Reasons why we should be considered! infotex provides a number of services that can be checked out if you click over to offerings.infotex.com! We even made a movie with all the reasons why infotex should be your next MSOC!  
    infotex and GoTo To all infotex managed security service Clients: As recently reported by major news outlets there was a data breach affecting GoTo (formerly LogMeIn) wherein attackers stole encrypted backups containing customer information in November 2022.  Based on the advisory from GoTo the products they offer that are affected include LogMeIn Pro, LogMeIn Central, […]
    An option for increasing security for ALL organizations. . . The threat landscape is evolving daily, and it is becoming increasingly difficult for even large organizations providing cyber defense services to keep up. As Brandao (2021) notes, it is important for organizations to adapt holistic technologies that can correlate all attack events. Therefore, developing XDR […]
    Another awareness poster for YOUR customers (and users).  Now that we have our own employees aware, maybe it’s time to start posting content for our customers! Check out posters.infotex.com for the whole collection! Download the large versions here: Awareness Poster (Portrait) Awareness Poster (Landscape) You are welcome to print out and distribute this around your […]
    A relic of the internet’s less secure past, many small firms struggle to secure their email systems… An article review. With a great deal of cybersecurity related news focused on new threats and similarly new techniques aimed at combating them, it can be easy to forget some of the older threats that have never gone […]
    Seven Trends . . . …that small bank Information Security Officers face in 2023 Another one of those Dan’s New Leaf Posts, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . Welcome to the Magnificent Seven, my annual predictive article about the seven trends in technology that will impact the Information Security Officers of […]
    System Security and Cybersecurity are not the same thing. . . Another one of those Dan’s New Leaf Posts, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . Regarding “information security,” the last thirty years have seen an evolution of frameworks, laws, and assessment approaches which intimidate the management team with their complexity.  […]
    The cryptographic algorithm is vulnerable to attack and is no longer considered secure… An article review. NIST has announced that it plans to retire the SHA-1 cryptographic algorithm by the end of 2030, citing multiple vulnerabilities in the standard, effectively ending its use after nearly 30 years.  Introduced in 1995, SHA-1 used a 160-bit hash […]