As an example
Will help, not replace. . .
Well, as if the coders read my post last week and update to the GPT store has just fully challenged the notion of whether AI will replace the cyber security practitioner.
And in the spirit of full confidence that AI will help us and not replace us I post a link to the new cyber security GPT here.
I have not vetted it. In fact, I have not even had a chance to look at it. It could be terrible. It could be amazing.
However…

Unlike AI, my gray matter is busy helping people understand the risk of AI, and therefore I will not get to looking at this until this weekend, or maybe even the following weekend.
And if somebody has a question for me, and I can’t get back to them somewhere down the road, they might try CybGPT. And then they will take my call when I get back to them because they want to know if they can believe what they’re understanding from the large language model. My clients will be better informed, and therefore awareness will be better, and since awareness is 9/11s of the battle, our Clients will be safer.
I am not afraid of AI, but I respect it. And I expect its developers to bolt security on, instead of building it in.
This is not a game. Our Clients trust us because we empower them to protect their money, their people, their systems, and their reputations.
Our mission is to EMPOWER our Clients to be safe, not make them safe. We will never “make them safe.” But we can show them how to be safer. And that includes introducing them to new tools like CybGPT.
Where other organizations pretend they can end cyber risk, we embrace it. It’s never gonna go away. But it’s also the reason you can stand out in the pack.
So let us know what you think of CybGPT – it will help us help our Clients take appropriate risk, starting from a safer position, and confident in the reality of their safety.

Original article by Dan Hadaway CRISC CISA CISM. Founder and Information Architect, infotex
”Dan’s New Leaf” – a fun blog to inspire thought in IT Governance.