About Us | Contact Us
View Cart

Risk-Based Authentication Practices

By Dan Hadaway | Monday, June 21, 2021 - Leave a Comment

A follow-up on Dan’s 2008 Password Manifesto


On the NIST Publication on Digital Identity Guidelines
Another one of those Dan’s New Leaf Posts, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . .


In June 2017, NIST released a special publication on digital identity, NIST SP 800-63, that is starting to get the attention of our larger Clients.  We believe this is due in-part because some in management want to use the guidance to justify weaker authentication controls.  I posit this because one of the questions I received about this actually pointed to the recommendation to use 8-character passwords on low-risk systems.

Now, I still maintain it’s easier to type a 20-character sentence than an 8-character strong password, but putting that aside, I guess I can see weaker requirements on low-risk systems as okay.  But why confuse the heck out of users??  And who has low-risk systems?

But again, let’s put that to the side and talk about real-world uses of a risk-based approach to authentication.

While I admit I didn’t read the entire thing yet (it’s 100+ pages), I do like the notion of taking a “risk-based approach” to authentication.  The NIST publication appears to define 3 specific levels of ‘authentication assurance’.  Similar to how the CAT now requires us to perform a criticality analysis so we know where to focus our monitoring controls, this guidance defines acceptable authentication requirements for 3 levels of asset sensitivities.  They are called Authenticator Assurance Levels, (AAL), where

  • AAL1 is for low-risk
  • AAL2 is for moderate-risk
  • AAL3 is for high-risk

It defines permitted authentication types (AAL1 is anything from just a memorized password to multi-factor cryptographic device whereas AAL3 only allows multi-factor methods), how often re-authentication should be required, and other standards.

In terms of how regulators are implementing it, the auditors at infotex have NOT seen anything referencing these new guidelines in our audits, to-date.  Still, since this guidance is relatively new, something will most likely be coming especially for banks over 5 billion.

Be sure to note that the NIST guidelines explicitly state they don’t take into account physical access controls.  Additionally, when adding additional authentication factors like biometrics, the need for excessively long and overly complex passwords does reduce a bit (but not entirely).  Similar to how we’ve seen guidance change on frequency of password expiration/changes . . . the reason a risk-based approach is great is because it will allow us to base strategy on how people actually use these authentication systems.  By requiring unique, excessively long, and complex passwords that are changed too frequently, we may inadvertently be encouraging bad practices like using easily identifiable words and information since users have no other way to keep all these credentials memorized.

For resources, I direct you to my original article on password aging from long before Microsoft finally agreed it was an outdated control:  https://my.infotex.com/manifesto/

And, if you haven’t thought to use it, consider sharing this oft reference XKCD comic with your management team, it helps explain how password complexity is sometimes a misnomer in terms of actual strength of passwords:  https://xkcd.com/936/


Original article by Dan Hadaway CRISC CISA CISM. Founder and Managing Partner, infotex

“Dan’s New Leaf” is a “fun blog to inspire thought in the area of IT Governance.”

 


same_strip_012513


 

Latest News
    Community Banking and their layers of security. . . Michael Hartke’s first post as Executive Vice President! Thinking back to my first talk to security professionals in community banking almost 10 years ago, the question continues to this day. First some background… infotex was moderating the Indiana Bankers Association Security Conference when one of the […]
    Reasons why we should be considered! infotex provides a number of services that can be checked out if you click over to offerings.infotex.com! We even made a movie with all the reasons why infotex should be your next MSOC!  
    infotex and GoTo To all infotex managed security service Clients: As recently reported by major news outlets there was a data breach affecting GoTo (formerly LogMeIn) wherein attackers stole encrypted backups containing customer information in November 2022.  Based on the advisory from GoTo the products they offer that are affected include LogMeIn Pro, LogMeIn Central, […]
    An option for increasing security for ALL organizations. . . The threat landscape is evolving daily, and it is becoming increasingly difficult for even large organizations providing cyber defense services to keep up. As Brandao (2021) notes, it is important for organizations to adapt holistic technologies that can correlate all attack events. Therefore, developing XDR […]
    Another awareness poster for YOUR customers (and users).  Now that we have our own employees aware, maybe it’s time to start posting content for our customers! Check out posters.infotex.com for the whole collection! Download the large versions here: Awareness Poster (Portrait) Awareness Poster (Landscape) You are welcome to print out and distribute this around your […]
    A relic of the internet’s less secure past, many small firms struggle to secure their email systems… An article review. With a great deal of cybersecurity related news focused on new threats and similarly new techniques aimed at combating them, it can be easy to forget some of the older threats that have never gone […]
    Seven Trends . . . …that small bank Information Security Officers face in 2023 Another one of those Dan’s New Leaf Posts, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . Welcome to the Magnificent Seven, my annual predictive article about the seven trends in technology that will impact the Information Security Officers of […]
    System Security and Cybersecurity are not the same thing. . . Another one of those Dan’s New Leaf Posts, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . Regarding “information security,” the last thirty years have seen an evolution of frameworks, laws, and assessment approaches which intimidate the management team with their complexity.  […]
    The cryptographic algorithm is vulnerable to attack and is no longer considered secure… An article review. NIST has announced that it plans to retire the SHA-1 cryptographic algorithm by the end of 2030, citing multiple vulnerabilities in the standard, effectively ending its use after nearly 30 years.  Introduced in 1995, SHA-1 used a 160-bit hash […]
    Another awareness poster for YOUR customers (and users).  Now that we have our own employees aware, maybe it’s time to start posting content for our customers! Check out posters.infotex.com for the whole collection! Download the large versions here: Awareness Poster (Portrait) Awareness Poster (Landscape) You are welcome to print out and distribute this around your […]