About Us | Contact Us
View Cart

Object Access Limitations

By Matt Jolley | Monday, March 5, 2018 - Leave a Comment

Object Access Limitations. . .


While offering some visibility, there are limitations to object access monitoring.


If your organization has to comply with industry regulations such as GLBA, HIPAA, or Sarbanes Oxley, you know that maintaining data security and privacy are important, and one of the ways you can accomplish that is with object access auditing. As a managed security service provider, we are very familiar with the pros and cons of object access auditing.  With object access auditing set up, attempts to access or modify monitored files is logged, typically like this:

Jan 7 15:15:40: bjones performed action ReadData on E:\Company_Drive\filename_01.xlsx
——
Jan 7 15:15:40: bjones performed action ReadData on E:\Company_Drive\filename_02.xlsx
——
Jan 7 15:15:43: bjones performed action ReadData on E:\Company_Drive\filename_03.xlsx
——
Jan 7 15:15:49: bjones performed action ReadData on E:\Company_Drive\filename_04.xlsx
——
Jan 7 15:15:49: bjones performed action ReadData on E:\Company_Drive\filename_05.xlsx

Collecting all this data is only one part of the puzzle, however. How do we know when we should be concerned? Are user bjones’ actions here suspicious, or can we assume that bjones is a legitimate user going about his business?

Finding the answer may require additional knowledge. A check of the schedule will reveal if bjones was scheduled to work on the 7th, and a look at logon failures can show if the account may have been broken into. This need for extra information means object access reports on their own are not indicative of malicious behavior, but rather they are part of wider incident investigations that involve other contextual clues.

An added difficulty when trying to sort through the noise is that suspicious looking reports can be generated by the operating system automatically, simply because the user opened a directory. In the example above, it appears that user bjones copied a number of files—a potentially malicious act. Unfortunately with object access, just highlighting or right-clicking one of those files by accident can sometimes look identical to opening it and Windows does not distinguish between any of the “Read” actions.

This means that read actions alone do not contain enough information by themselves to be used without some other type of data, like a write action to another directory or some other type of complementary data from another log.

Because of these limitations, object access as it is currently implemented does not work as a data exfiltration control in and of itself, it just remains a piece of the data exfiltration puzzle.


Article written by Matt Jolley.  Beyond writing for the infotex blog, Matt is a Data Security Analyst for the infotex NOC.


same_strip_012513


 

Latest News
    The Four Basic Truths of System Security Webinar-Video The last thirty years have seen an evolution of frameworks, laws, and assessment approaches to information security which can intimidate the management team with their complexity. This webinar will discuss the four basic truths of system security regardless of frameworks or approach, and eight control systems to […]
    Community Banking and their layers of security. . . Michael Hartke’s first post as Executive Vice President! Thinking back to my first talk to security professionals in community banking almost 10 years ago, the question continues to this day. First some background… infotex was moderating the Indiana Bankers Association Security Conference when one of the […]
    Reasons why we should be considered! infotex provides a number of services that can be checked out if you click over to offerings.infotex.com! We even made a movie with all the reasons why infotex should be your next MSOC!  
    infotex and GoTo To all infotex managed security service Clients: As recently reported by major news outlets there was a data breach affecting GoTo (formerly LogMeIn) wherein attackers stole encrypted backups containing customer information in November 2022.  Based on the advisory from GoTo the products they offer that are affected include LogMeIn Pro, LogMeIn Central, […]
    An option for increasing security for ALL organizations. . . The threat landscape is evolving daily, and it is becoming increasingly difficult for even large organizations providing cyber defense services to keep up. As Brandao (2021) notes, it is important for organizations to adapt holistic technologies that can correlate all attack events. Therefore, developing XDR […]
    Another awareness poster for YOUR customers (and users).  Now that we have our own employees aware, maybe it’s time to start posting content for our customers! Check out posters.infotex.com for the whole collection! Download the large versions here: Awareness Poster (Portrait) Awareness Poster (Landscape) You are welcome to print out and distribute this around your […]
    A relic of the internet’s less secure past, many small firms struggle to secure their email systems… An article review. With a great deal of cybersecurity related news focused on new threats and similarly new techniques aimed at combating them, it can be easy to forget some of the older threats that have never gone […]
    Seven Trends . . . …that small bank Information Security Officers face in 2023 Another one of those Dan’s New Leaf Posts, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . Welcome to the Magnificent Seven, my annual predictive article about the seven trends in technology that will impact the Information Security Officers of […]
    System Security and Cybersecurity are not the same thing. . . Another one of those Dan’s New Leaf Posts, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . Regarding “information security,” the last thirty years have seen an evolution of frameworks, laws, and assessment approaches which intimidate the management team with their complexity.  […]
    The cryptographic algorithm is vulnerable to attack and is no longer considered secure… An article review. NIST has announced that it plans to retire the SHA-1 cryptographic algorithm by the end of 2030, citing multiple vulnerabilities in the standard, effectively ending its use after nearly 30 years.  Introduced in 1995, SHA-1 used a 160-bit hash […]