About Us | Contact Us
View Cart

New Chinese Law Highlights Disclosure Debate

By Vigilize | Monday, September 13, 2021 - Leave a Comment

Questions about China’s new disclosure laws only highlight the uncertainty about disclosure in general…


An article review.


yellow bullhorn with chalkboard behind it with lines expressing noise

China recently made waves in the security world by announcing a new set of data security laws, one of which has added new fuel to a long running debate: how and when should security vulnerabilities be disclosed…and to who?

The new law, as described in a recent article on BreakingDefense, would require security vulnerabilities to be disclosed to the Chinese government before anyone else.  The law, which also applies to foreign companies with a footprint in China, also prohibits the distribution of vulnerability information to any foreign entity, aside from the manufacturer of the product in question.

While this new law is drawing controversy due to allegations concerning the role of the Chinese government in cyberattacks, the law also serves as a reminder that the ethics of vulnerability disclosure continue to be debated…and when it comes to disclosure, doing it improperly can result in disaster.

Take for example an incident from 2015, where Google disclosed a serious security vulnerability in Microsoft Windows days before a patch was available to mitigate it.  While Google was following its own vulnerability disclosure policy in making the public notification, Microsoft claimed Google refused to cooperate with them by delaying disclosure until it could release a patch, claiming it put users at risk.

When it comes to the duties of researchers in notifying the public about a vulnerability versus their duty to allow manufacturers a chance to mitigate those vulnerabilities there’s no single set of rules to be followed: both Google and Microsoft believe their policies were in the best interests of users…and both blame each other for putting users at risk.

While there is still no end in sight to the debate regarding ethical disclosure, this new law suggests that it will only become increasingly important as more countries realize the potential offensive value of security vulnerabilities and how they are disclosed…if they’re disclosed at all, that is.


Original article by Brad Williams, writing for BreakingDefense.


Interested in MSOC, Audit, or Other Assessments and Tests? Visit offerings.infotex.com to let us know!


same_strip_012513


 

Latest News
    Why It Rhymes With SEEM (And its Not the I Before E Rule) Another one of those Dan’s New Leaf Posts, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . It’s the Gestalt. The idea that the whole is greater than the sum of it’s parts. That’s not something that is often brought […]
    Another awareness poster for YOUR customers (and users).  Now that we have our own employees aware, maybe it’s time to start posting content for our customers! Download the large versions here: Awareness Poster (Portrait) Awareness Poster (Landscape)   You are welcome to print out and distribute this around your office. Interested in one of ours […]
    Questions about China’s new disclosure laws only highlight the uncertainty about disclosure in general… An article review. China recently made waves in the security world by announcing a new set of data security laws, one of which has added new fuel to a long running debate: how and when should security vulnerabilities be disclosed…and to […]
    Four Conditions … …For Why a Network Can be Anything But a Network! Another one of those Dan’s New Leaf Posts, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . I have to admit that infotex is being called into engineering meetings with larger organizations these days that are NOT community based banks.  We […]
    Another awareness poster for YOUR customers (and users).  Now that we have our own employees aware, maybe it’s time to start posting content for our customers! Download the large versions here: Awareness Poster (Portrait) Awareness Poster (Landscape)   You are welcome to print out and distribute this around your office. Interested in one of ours […]
    If Zero days need Zero clicks, are there any secure devices in the mix? Tanvee Dhir explores the Pegasus spyware. Another technical post, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . Introduction Over the past couple of weeks, we have seen multiple stories regarding a powerful piece of spyware called Pegasus sold […]
    Our Lead Non-Technical Auditor takes a look at the new AIO Guidance… Architecture, Infrastructure, and Operations (AIO) is the latest booklet released by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) in their line of  IT Examination Handbooks. It is an update to their 2004 Operations booklet and, as the name implies, expands into the areas […]
    Another awareness poster for YOUR customers (and users).  Now that we have our own employees aware, maybe it’s time to start posting content for our customers! Download the large versions here: Awareness Poster (Portrait) Awareness Poster (Landscape)   You are welcome to print out and distribute this around your office. Interested in one of ours […]
    Many organizations still fail to consider the unique risks posed by cloud computing… An article review. Last month thousands of Western Digital MyCloud device owners learned about the risks of cloud-based solutions the hard way: their data had been wiped remotely due to a flaw in the internet-facing component of their external hard drives. While […]
    infotex does not use Kaseya… We are protecting our Clients! Another blog post meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . To all infotex managed security service Clients: As you may be aware there was a large ransomware attack recently that leveraged a remote management tool called Kaseya that is used by many […]