About Us | Contact Us
View Cart

Analysis of the FFIEC’s Statement on Cloud Computing

By Vigilize | Tuesday, July 31, 2012 - Leave a Comment

On July 10th, 2012, the FFIEC published a “Statement on Cloud Computing” in a new section of the ffiec.gov resource library for guidelines related to information technology governance.  This statement served to declare that cloud computing providers are simply another form of outsourcing, and thus banks are required to apply due diligence to cloud providers just like any other vendor.  We would like to add what we read between the lines: even if the cloud service is free.


The FFIEC Take on Cloud Computing


Beyond this clarification, we believe that there really is nothing new in the statement; as long as  your existing vendor management process is strong, it should already be properly addressing cloud computing.  In other words, if  you are appropriately aligned with the framework of the Outsourcing Technology Services Booklet (“Outsourcing Booklet”), you are already properly addressing the cloud computing service model.

However, we also believe that the FFIEC would not have published this statement had they not been finding, on a national scale, what we’re seeing in some of the banks we’re auditing:  management team members are bypassing vendor management controls.  We’ve already published links to stories about data losses and horror stories related to cloud computing.

Beyond requiring that your management team members better understand those controls, the statement also highlights a few critical issues that, though not unique to cloud computing, are inherent in the cloud computing model:

1)      Data Classification:   The sensitivity of the data “uploaded to the cloud” will determine the level of scrutiny and required controls PRIOR to engaging a cloud provider.  If data is classified as confidential or critical, the same controls we’d require of our critical vendors would be required of a cloud provider.  For those of us who have justified NOT performing a data classification analysis, where we inventory all data and categorize it as Public, Confidential, or Critical, cloud computing might be the straw that breaks that camel’s back.

2)      Data Segregation:  Because cloud computing leverages the community use of shared resources, an important part of your due diligence checklist for cloud computers should include ensuring that controls are in place to ensure integrity and confidentiality of data.   We want to be sure that our data is not being stored in a manner where one customer can access another customer’s data (either accidentally or maliciously.)

3)      Business Continuity:  The statement uses the term “recoverability,” but the same business continuity questions you’d ask of any vendor will need to be asked of your cloud providers.  Though the statement does not specifically express this, we also believe you should be sure you know how data can be recovered in the event you fire the cloud provider.   The best way to establish this is to establish that you own the data.  Of course, if the generic agreement . . . . that accept button you or your manager clicked . . . . doesn’t establish this then the data you already uploaded is no longer yours.

4)      Breach Notification:  Check the standard agreement that accompanies cloud sites and you’ll often find that this important legal and reputational risk mitigator is missing.  You can mitigate this by watching the cloud provider in the press but would you accept this with other vendors who you pay to host your data?

5)      Destruction of NPI:  If you end your relationship with the cloud provider, how do you know that your data has been properly purged from their systems, and won’t be discovered a few years down the road on some retired server that was donated to your provider’s favorite charity?

If you, like most banks, have been taking vendor management seriously, you should not have much to worry about with cloud computing, other than what you’re probably already worried about:  getting your management team to remember the need for vendor due diligence.

 

Latest News
    Artificial intelligence carries risk, but so does organic ignorance … Another one of those Dan’s New Leaf Posts, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . At a recent conference, I noticed two camps emerging in the debate over artificial intelligence. Some people embrace AI as a tool, while others support Elon […]
    PRESS RELEASE – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE BUSINESS NEWS NEW EMPLOYEE FOR INFOTEX We are pleased to announce the appointment of Nathan Taylor as our new Network Administrator at infotex.  “We are very excited to have Nathan join our team as a Network Administrator and look forward to his contributions to maintaining and improving our infrastructure!” […]
    about artificial intelligence . . . And who will protect us from it . . .  Another one of those Dan’s New Leaf Posts, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . Just watched some press on the the Senate hearings over regulating AI. The normal senator faces, Sam Altman of OpenAI, […]
    The Evolution of an Inside Term Used in our Vendor Risk Report Another one of those Dan’s New Leaf Posts, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . Those who audit infotex know that our vendor risk report refers to a couple of our providers as “ransomware companies.” This reference started evolving […]
    Another awareness poster for YOUR customers (and users). Now that we have our own employees aware, maybe it’s time to start posting content for our customers! Check out posters.infotex.com for the whole collection! Download the large versions here: Awareness Poster (Portrait) Awareness Poster (Landscape) You are welcome to print out and distribute this around your […]
    New tools could allow unskilled attackers to launch increasingly sophisticated attacks… An article review. Imagine a world where you receive a call from your boss asking you to assist them with something… only it’s not your boss, but an AI being used by an attacker.  This isn’t science fiction, it’s an actual attack that has […]
    Unavailability Strikes Where it doesn’t matter anyway Another one of those Dan’s New Leaf Posts, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . So, I’m writing today’s article from a resort in the middle of Wisconsin.  I want to make sure I’m staying on top of my New Leaf, which is to […]
    . . . and the importance of segregated response. The latest edition of Executive Vice President, Michael Hartke’s article series! In 2007 when I first joined infotex, coming from small to medium sized business general IT support into the world of cybersecurity, the one thing that was very hard for me to internally rectify was […]
    How concerts can help us understand APTs . . . Especially if you use your imagination! Another one of those Dan’s New Leaf Posts, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . My daughter reminded me of a concert Stacey and I attended way back in 2013, in Chicago.  It was one […]
    Mutiny! The Malicious Insider Threat Webinar Registration A Webinar-Video It is often awkward to bring up the one attack vector most of us have not addressed. The malicious insider threat. Even if we can flaunt all statistics and claim that the likelihood of an insider attack is low in our bank, the impact is still […]