About Us | Contact Us
View Cart

Vendor Classifications

By Vigilize | Tuesday, October 7, 2014 - Leave a Comment

Vendor Management Step One:  The Threshold Analysis


ServIcons_ITAudit_01

“We don’t do diligence on that vendor because we have mitigating controls in place.”

A common problem in most organizations is that nobody is on the same page about the way vendors are classified.  Purchasers are classifying them by ease-of-use, CFO’s by value, Compliance Officers by residual risk, and information security professionals are just now getting a handle on the issue.

We have found that the easiest manner of classification considers the following factors:

  1.  Access to Information: If they host (possess, take-with-them, provide-in-the-cloud-services) information that is considered to be confidential or critical in nature (see data classification articles) then they should be considered to be Critical Vendors.  If they have access to information temporarily, and that information is not large volumes of customer information (NPI), then they should be considered High Risk.  We have a handly “threshold analysis” that helps sort through these questions.
  2. Business Impact: If the vendor provides a product or service that, if suddenly unavailable, would cause a critical business impact, that vendor should be considered a Critical or High Risk Vendor, depending upon available mitigating controls or compensating factors.  Again, we have a template “threshold analysis” that helps sort through these questions.

A good threshold analysis helps lay a paper-trail not only for those vendors whom you perform due diligence upon, but more importantly, for those vendors you do NOT scrutinize.  The analysis should be quantitative, and it should be applied to all vendors at least once.

We actually suggest a quantitative analysis be run on all active vendors periodically (for our program, it’s every three years.)  New vendors are analyzed, of course, prior to engagement.  But to make sure nobody falls through the cracks . . . . and they do . . . . and to also be sure that changes in service-sets do not change vendor profiles enough to change their classification . . . we run a full analysis on all active vendors every three years.  Some of our bank clients do this annually, others bi-annually. 

The minimum-effective-dosage approach to vendor management would warrant that at least once, all active vendors undergo a full analysis.  The analysis would consider various risk-factors such as type of information, type of access to the information, volume, how easy it is to replace the vendor, and other questions along side the standard financial statement and security controls review.

It is important to remember that the initial threshold analysis is about inherent risk, rather than residual risk.  The controls we can apply should not factor into determining whether we should consider the controls we can apply.  (Re-read that sentence, it is correctly stated.)  Very often we will hear statements like, “we didn’t put them through the threshold analysis because we do background checks on their employees for them.”


A templated threshold analysis is available as a stand-alone document and is also available in our Vendor Management Kit.  Of course, Clients are welcome to any of our boilerplates at no charge, just e-mail us.


 

same_strip_012513


The threshold analysis is where we sort vendors by Inherent Risk.

Posted in Infotex News

Latest News
    Why It Rhymes With SEEM (And its Not the I Before E Rule) Another one of those Dan’s New Leaf Posts, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . It’s the Gestalt. The idea that the whole is greater than the sum of it’s parts. That’s not something that is often brought […]
    Another awareness poster for YOUR customers (and users).  Now that we have our own employees aware, maybe it’s time to start posting content for our customers! Download the large versions here: Awareness Poster (Portrait) Awareness Poster (Landscape)   You are welcome to print out and distribute this around your office. Interested in one of ours […]
    Questions about China’s new disclosure laws only highlight the uncertainty about disclosure in general… An article review. China recently made waves in the security world by announcing a new set of data security laws, one of which has added new fuel to a long running debate: how and when should security vulnerabilities be disclosed…and to […]
    Four Conditions … …For Why a Network Can be Anything But a Network! Another one of those Dan’s New Leaf Posts, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . I have to admit that infotex is being called into engineering meetings with larger organizations these days that are NOT community based banks.  We […]
    Another awareness poster for YOUR customers (and users).  Now that we have our own employees aware, maybe it’s time to start posting content for our customers! Download the large versions here: Awareness Poster (Portrait) Awareness Poster (Landscape)   You are welcome to print out and distribute this around your office. Interested in one of ours […]
    If Zero days need Zero clicks, are there any secure devices in the mix? Tanvee Dhir explores the Pegasus spyware. Another technical post, meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . Introduction Over the past couple of weeks, we have seen multiple stories regarding a powerful piece of spyware called Pegasus sold […]
    Our Lead Non-Technical Auditor takes a look at the new AIO Guidance… Architecture, Infrastructure, and Operations (AIO) is the latest booklet released by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) in their line of  IT Examination Handbooks. It is an update to their 2004 Operations booklet and, as the name implies, expands into the areas […]
    Another awareness poster for YOUR customers (and users).  Now that we have our own employees aware, maybe it’s time to start posting content for our customers! Download the large versions here: Awareness Poster (Portrait) Awareness Poster (Landscape)   You are welcome to print out and distribute this around your office. Interested in one of ours […]
    Many organizations still fail to consider the unique risks posed by cloud computing… An article review. Last month thousands of Western Digital MyCloud device owners learned about the risks of cloud-based solutions the hard way: their data had been wiped remotely due to a flaw in the internet-facing component of their external hard drives. While […]
    infotex does not use Kaseya… We are protecting our Clients! Another blog post meant to inspire thought about IT Governance . . . . To all infotex managed security service Clients: As you may be aware there was a large ransomware attack recently that leveraged a remote management tool called Kaseya that is used by many […]